fa3_c50_counter_espionage
fa3_c50_counter_espionage
Comments here pls.
Re: fa3_c50_counter_espionage
Unfortunate incident aside, this rocked.
The slingloading theft under fire idea looked awesome.
I'd ask for more helos just to get in on the action on the days I'm not fast enough on the clickfest
In fact, I think we just proved that slingloading is within the capabilities of FA pilots and we ought to think about using the mechanism more in new missions...
The slingloading theft under fire idea looked awesome.
I'd ask for more helos just to get in on the action on the days I'm not fast enough on the clickfest
In fact, I think we just proved that slingloading is within the capabilities of FA pilots and we ought to think about using the mechanism more in new missions...
guns.ie ● stochasticgeometry.ie ● weak.ie
Don't tell mom I'm a pilot, she thinks I play piano in a whorehouse
Don't tell mom I'm a pilot, she thinks I play piano in a whorehouse
Re: fa3_c50_counter_espionage
What this mission demonstrates is that if you are going to write a sequential, multi-objective mission, make object #1 something that the platoon could reasonably be expected to accomplish with zero casualties if 'done right'.
Re: fa3_c50_counter_espionage
I think it did right? Prior to take off we had no casualties anyway, or am I wrong?
-
SuicideKing
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 1:29 pm
- Location: India/Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: fa3_c50_counter_espionage
I would say so, stealing the helos was fun and (iirc) without casualties. If the platoon can't reasonably be expected to avoid powerlines then...we need more workshops. 
FIST, SHARK, FLAME, BURST, BONZO, WILDCAT, GRIZZLY, DUKE, DEMON 
Re: fa3_c50_counter_espionage
You did. IIRC we took no losses before the beginning of our ill-fated lift.Eagle_Eye wrote:I think it did right? Prior to take off we had no casualties anyway, or am I wrong?
